Elizabeth Warren

We keep hearing Elizabeth Warren and other Democrats using the word ‘disproportionate” when it comes to President Trump green-lighting the drone strike that rid the world of Iran’s top terrorist leaders

 

Last week we reported how Elizabeth Warren the cowering Senator from Massachusetts bent the knee to the liberal social media mob and changed her description of Iran’s top terrorist leader after she originally labeled Soleimani a “terrorist.”

During an exchange on Monday’s broadcast of “The View” Whalelephant co-host Meghan McCain confronted Warren over how she described Soleimani, the head of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps who was killed by a drone airstrike last week in Iraq.

“This is a man who is obviously responsible for hundreds of American troops’ deaths, carnage, we can’t even imagine,” McCain told Warren.

But Warren simply referred to Soleimani as a murderer rather than a terrorist and insisted that his death was an assassination.

Later during the exchange, McCain pressed Warren further on the use of the word “terrorist.”

“Do you think he is a terrorist?” McCain insisted.

Warren responded, “He’s part of a group that is but — ”

McCain interrupted and demanded an answer.

“But is he a terrorist?” she pressed.

Warren finally responded, “Of course he is, he’s part of a group that our federal government has designated as a terrorist. The question, though, is ‘What’s the right response?’ And the response that Donald Trump has picked is the most incendiary and has moved us right to the edge of war, and that is not in our long term interests.”

I hardly ever agree with Carbzilla McCain but I’ll throw her a snickers bar for at least peppering Elizabeth Warren on why she refuses to refer to Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani as a terrorist.

But for the life of me how can Democrats like Warren continue to call President Trump taking out two of Iran’s top terrorist leaders, Soleimani, Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis, and a few bodyguards “disproportionate” when Soleimani alone was directly responsible for the deaths of 603 Americans, and indirectly for thousands more?

Two of Iran’s terrorist leaders and a few monkey’s acting as muscle in exchange for 603 Americans seem “disproportionate” alright, but my meaning would be the complete opposite to what the Democrats are trying to imply.

 

When will The Media Simply Ask These Hate America Trump Deranged Democrats…

So what would you do if you were President and had Soleimani in your sights, knowing for a fact that he was directly responsible for the deaths of 603 Americans, many of whom served in the military, and indirectly responsible for the deaths of thousands more?

But no, conservative media wastes the whole interview trying to get Warren and other Democrats to say Soleimani was a “terrorist,” which they will simply backtrack later on Twitter anyway.

Hits: 0

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here