Way to cover for a terrorist, Snopes. Thanks for proving you’re a ridiculously biased and useless rag that we can continue to write off when frothy-mouthed lefties use you as a source for their silly arguments.
This spin by Snopes sort of reminds us of the time Bill Clinton said, “It depends on what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is. If the—if he—if ‘is’ means is and never has been, that is not—that is one thing.”
Snopes is gonna Snopes. But c’mon, really???
Look at this crap:
Here’s more of Dan MacGuill’s work. https://t.co/tlfv143jl3
— Tom Chamberlain (@ChamberlainDr) July 20, 2020
You know, man, the word ‘terrorist’ could mean a lot of different things. So what if she was arrested for trying to blow up buildings and stuff, man, it doesn’t make her a terrorist and stuff.
The mental gymnastics these douche-canoes went through to rate this claim as half-false is impressive and not in a good way.