Victoria’s Secret becomes the latest ‘woke’ corporation after they kicked their ‘angels’ to the curb, and replacing them with beasts like Megan Rapinoe & Priyanka Chopra as the new faces for the brand.
The lingerie company is doing some radical leftist rebranding. They’re ditching their ‘Victoria’s Secret Angels’ supermodels in favor of leftist he/she empowerment icons.
Evidently, Victoria’s Secret, known for selling the male sex fantasy, has its sights set on going broke.
Victoria’s Secret Replaces Beauty With The Beast
The move, which was revealed on Wednesday in a New York Times article, is presented as an attempt to shed the company’s “dated” approach to selling underwear.
Victoria's Secret is getting rid of its Angels and wings. The company has hired new representatives — including soccer star Megan Rapinoe and actress Priyanka Chopra Jonas — as it tries to conduct one of the most extreme brand turnarounds in recent memory. https://t.co/tdP4s3cCNM
— The New York Times (@nytimes) June 16, 2021
The NYT article reported that VS is grounding its host of “angels” – supermodels in fantasy bras and exotic wings.
And replacing them with a team of seven women that check all the boxes of the company’s new “woke values”.
The so-called VS Collective includes:
- Unhinged LGBT activist Megan Rapinoe.
- Chinese-American skier Eileen Gu.
- Swiss-American biracial plus-size model Paloma Elsesser.
- Indian entertainer and rights advocate Priyanka Chopra.
They and others on the team will advise the brand, appear in ads and promote Victoria’s Secret on Instagram.
Victoria’s Secret Making Men Worldwide Regurgitate
Seeing Megan Rapinoe will surely make women run to Victoria’s Secret to snatch up the latest lingerie.
Unfortunately for men everywhere, just the thought of seeing Megan Rapinoe modeling some sexy underwear is nauseating enough.
But now actually seeing, will have them running to the bathroom to vomit.
Of course, if Victoria’s Secret real motive is to sexually catrate men… Then two thumbs up for their ingenious plan.
‘Woke” Women Aren’t Buying What Victoria’s Secret Is Selling.
The New York Times wondered if women “would buy it”. And that question was quickly answered by many of its liberal women readers who seem to agree.
Some tweeted that Victoria’s Secret’s repackaging its lingerie as an empowerment garment won’t work if the product remains overpriced and of poor quality.
Others doubted that the company will be ditching its unethical hypocrite cost-cutting manufacturing practices along with its angels.
Is part of the rebrand them paying a living wage to workers who make their garments? Because as of now, they use slave labor from people who are incarcerated.
— Emily Todebush (@EmilyTodebush) June 16, 2021
Great new representation but the underwear is uncomfortable.
— DaleWillResist (@awelab1956) June 17, 2021
OK, but are they going to start making quality garments worthy of their exorbitant Price points? Or they just repackaging the same all crap?
— Cielo is Blue (๑╹ᆺ╹) (@cieloisblue2) June 16, 2021
Who TF cares about their advertising! The issue is NOT using organic, sustainable materials, using slave labor.. why don’t they spend their money on that. & Get rid of that horrible perfume crap right by the register! Earth doesn’t need more chemicals!
— Abbey Scott △̶ (@AbbeyScott16) June 16, 2021
Can’t we just let Models be Models, Athletes be Athletes and Actresses be Actresses?
— Jasmin (@jn_arora) June 16, 2021